Movement. The presence of these Darfuri groups in Eastern Sudan is perceived as a direct threat to the region’s stability, prompting local leaders to call for their removal. These groups are seen by some as aggravating local conflicts, fueling demands from local leaders for their exclusion from the region.
Tensions have escalated further following statements by Sheiba Dirar, leader of the “Eastern Sudan Parties and Forces,” who publicly called on the Sudanese Armed Forces to remove the Darfuri armed groups from Eastern Sudan. This highlights significant rifts within the allied factions, reflecting the fragility of existing alliances and the complexities of competing interests and divergent objectives.
5. Militarization of Civil Life and Escalation of Violence
The proliferation of militias has led to the militarization of civilian life in Eastern Sudan, where local communities are caught between competing armed groups vying for control over resources. Civilians now face constant threats to their safety, with a rise in incidents of violence, arbitrary arrests, and persecution of dissenting voices, contributing to a climate of insecurity and obstructing developmental efforts.
Activists and journalists in Eastern Sudan have also faced mounting repression, including arrests and harassment. This repression has severely restricted freedom of expression, depriving citizens of their basic rights. There have been grave human rights violations, including extrajudicial killings, as seen in the case of activist Al-Amin Mohamed Nour, who died in the custody of the General Intelligence Service in Kassala. This ongoing suppression creates an environment where opposing or critical views are met with intimidation or violence, exacerbating the suffering of the population.
The militarization of civil life leads to the erosion of rule of law and empowers armed groups to control daily life, undermining governmental institutions and obstructing the establishment of stability and sustainable development in the region. Consequently, civil governance and the enforcement of legal frameworks become nearly impossible, as any dissent or opposition is met with intimidation, exacerbating the population’s hardships.
6. Economic Impact and Conflict over Resources
Eastern Sudan is rich in natural resources, particularly gold deposits. Amid the regional chaos, leaders of some armed movements, such as the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudan Liberation Movement, have seized the opportunity to exploit these resources, particularly within the mining sector. Reports indicate that leaders of these factions have secured lucrative contracts for gold extraction in areas under their control, providing them with substantial revenue streams that bolster their military and political influence.
This exploitation of resources exacerbates tensions between armed factions and local power brokers, particularly figures like Nazir Tirik, who opposes granting influence and access to resources to outsiders. The struggle over control of resources has intensified ethnic rivalries, increasing internal divisions and further undermining social cohesion, impeding efforts to achieve peaceful coexistence within the community.
7. Growing Ethnic and Political Divisions
The escalating conflict in Eastern Sudan has deepened divisions among ethnic and political groups, with shifting alliances and competition for power exacerbating ethnic rivalries. These divisions are apparent in the tensions between leaders such as Amin Daoud and Nazir Tirik, whose disputes over how to govern the region have intensified. These escalating hostilities have resulted in increasingly hostile rhetoric among various ethnic groups, raising the likelihood of intercommunal violence.
Such internal divisions complicate efforts to foster social unity in Eastern Sudan, as leaders align themselves with competing factions, entrenching the conflict and increasing the risk of violence, especially given the widespread availability of weapons and the backing of external actors for some factions.
8. Regional Dimensions and the Threat of Broader Conflict
Eastern Sudan is poised to become a flashpoint for regional conflict, as competition between Eritrea and Ethiopia could intensify if the instability persists. Given existing tensions between Eritrea and Ethiopia, Eritrea’s growing influence in Eastern Sudan may provoke Ethiopia to intervene directly or support opposing factions to safeguard its interests.
This escalation threatens to draw the entire Horn of Africa region into a regional conflict, especially as external players, including Egypt and Turkey, seek to expand their influence in the Red Sea region. Such interventions threaten regional stability, making Eastern Sudan a new theater for prolonged international conflicts if left unaddressed.
9. Failure to Achieve a Lasting and Sustainable Settlement
The alliances among armed groups in Sudan have proven to be short-lived and fragile, with alliances shifting in response to vested interests and specific agendas, hindering any progress toward long-term stability. This has been particularly evident in the tensions between General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and the leaders of armed movements, especially the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudan Liberation Movement, who have disagreed over power-sharing and resource allocation, intensifying factional conflicts.
It is evident that armed groups lack a coherent vision or strategy for peaceful transition, making it difficult to establish a state governed by the rule of law. Rather than serving the interests of the people of Eastern Sudan, these armed groups pursue policies that further militarize the region and exacerbate conflicts.
10. The Need for a New Social Contract and Political Accord
It is evident that Eastern Sudan’s situation requires a comprehensive and sustainable solution that begins with establishing a new social contract and political consensus among all stakeholders. This process requires the engagement of all armed groups, tribal leaders, and civil society in an inclusive dialogue aimed at building a just state that guarantees the rights of all and achieves security and stability.
The initial step must involve demilitarizing the region and promoting a culture of civil peace, through the integration of armed groups into a unified national army and creating economic opportunities for the youth to reduce dependency on armed activities. Trust between various tribes should be rebuilt through mechanisms for reconciliation and transitional justice to address past grievances and ensure the stability of the region.
Conclusion
The situation in Eastern Sudan foreshadows a potential explosion with consequences that could extend across the entire region. The proliferation of armed groups, regional interventions, and ethnic divisions have turned Eastern Sudan into a hub of political and security conflicts, demanding serious actions by all parties to contain the crisis and prevent the region from becoming a persistent conflict zone.
Without concerted international and regional efforts to promote stability and the implementation of local mechanisms for justice and reconciliation, the future of Eastern Sudan remains fraught with tensions and conflicts. The pressing need now is to establish a mechanism to unify efforts and build a future grounded in security, justice, and sustainable development.